There are significant differences between gallium nitride (GaN) chargers and ordinary chargers (usually referring to silicon-based chargers) in terms of material, performance, volume, etc., here are the main differences:
1. The core materials are different
Gallium nitride (GaN): A third-generation semiconductor material with higher electron mobility, high temperature and high pressure resistance, and lower energy loss.
Ordinary charger (silicon/Si): Traditional silicon-based material, mature technology but limited physical performance, low efficiency at high frequencies.
2. Volume and weight
GaN Chargers:
Due to the high efficiency of GaN materials, the volume of transformers and heat dissipation components can be greatly reduced, and the volume is 30%~50% smaller than ordinary chargers at the same power.
For example, a 65W GaN charger can approach the size of Apple's 5W charger.
Silicon components require larger space and heat dissipation design, and are significantly larger at high power (such as 65W or more).
3. Efficiency and heat
GaN Chargers:
The switching frequency is higher, the energy conversion efficiency can reach more than 90%, and the heat generation is lower.
Suitable for high-power fast charging (such as PD 3.0, QC4+, etc.).
Common chargers:
The efficiency is low (about 80%~85%), and the heat generation is obvious at high power, which requires additional heat dissipation design.
4. Power density and fast charging capability
GaN Chargers:
It supports higher power (30W~140W, which is common in the market), and multiple outputs (such as fast charging laptops and mobile phones at the same time) are more stable.
Compatible with a variety of fast charging protocols (such as PD, PPS, QC, etc.).
Common chargers:
At high power (e.g. 100W or more), it is bulky, and the multi-port output may reduce power.
5. Price and lifespan
GaN Chargers:
The price is higher (1.5~3 times more expensive than silicon-based at the same power), but it is more power-saving and has a longer life (due to less heating) for long-term use.
Common chargers:
Inexpensive, but components age faster under high loads.
6. Applicable scenarios
GaN Chargers:
It is suitable for users who pursue portable, multi-device fast charging (such as laptops, mobile phones, and tablets charging at the same time).
Reduce the burden of carrying when traveling or on a business trip.
Common chargers:
Suitable for low power requirements (such as below 18W) or scenarios with limited budgets.
| characteristic | GaN charger | Normal charger |
|---|---|---|
| volume | Compact and lightweight | Larger |
| efficiency | >90% | 80%~85% |
| fever | low | Higher |
| Fast charging support | Multi-protocol high power | limited |
| Price | More expensive (but decreasing year by year) | cheap |
GaN is recommended for scenarios: high-power fast charging (such as laptops), simultaneous charging of multiple devices, or focusing on portability.
Ordinary chargers still have a place to play: low-power, price-sensitive devices (such as Bluetooth headphones, smart watches).

